ftmag
Skip to content

Channel 4 completely vindicated over its ‘preachers of hate’ documentary

LAST year Channel 4’s Dispatches programme, Undercover Mosque, secretly filmed a nest of fanatical Muslim clerics and teachers in Birmingham doing what they do best: spewing hate.

Among the comments made by imams during the film were:

Take that homosexual man and throw him off the mountain.

and

We hate the kuffar [non-Muslims].

Other quotes from preachers and teachers included “Allah created the woman deficient” and “by the age of ten, it becomes an obligation on us to force her to wear hijab and if she doesn’t wear hijab, we hit her”.

West Midlands constabulary investigated carried out an investigation of the content of the documentary, but the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) concluded there was not enough evidence to bring criminal charges for a breach of public order against any of the clerics.

Then, in a move that completely beggars belief, the police asked the CPS to consider a prosecution against Channel 4 for broadcasting a programme containing material likely to stir up racial hatred.

The police maintained that the documentary had edited the preachers’ words “to give them a more sinister meaning”, and that the documentary had had a negative impact in the community and the cohesion within it.

In other words:

Let’s capitulate to these lame-brained hate-mongers; let’s shoot the messenger instead.

When a prosecution against Channel 4 was ruled out, the police and the CPS reported the programme makers to Ofcom, the TV regulator, alleging “complete distortion” in the way the programme had been edited.

Once again the police and the CPS were left with egg on their faces. Ofcom rejected the complaints in a decision published in November 2007.

Despite Ofcom’s conclusion that the documentary was a “legitimate investigation, uncovering matters of important public interest”, West Midlands Police failed to take down the original press release, entitled Broadcast Out Of Context, from its website.

Channel 4 then took legal action to force its removal, and today news broke that the police are to pay Channel 4 £100,000 in damages and will apologise at the High Court for the false allegations it made.

Here is the police’s full apology.

Kevin Sutcliffe, deputy head of current affairs at Channel 4, said:

We have been very pleased to get the result.

And he asked:

Why did they go after the programme in such a way? It seems to us a large amount of public money and time spent trying to bring us down.

David Henshaw, executive producer and managing director of Hardcash Productions said:

This was a thorough and detailed one-hour documentary, made over nine months and at personal risk to the undercover reporter. The abhorrent and extreme comments made by fundamentalist preachers in the film speak for themselves.

They later claimed they had been taken out of context - but no one has explained the correct context for arguing that women are ‘born deficient’, that homosexuals should be thrown off mountains and that ten-year-old girls should be hit if they refuse to wear the hijab.

This is a clip of the imbecile Abu Usamah in full rant, from the Dispatches in question:

HAT TIP: Mediawatchwatch.

Posted by Barry Duke @ 6:57 pm

Giving Mormons a taste of their own medicine

A WEEK of warm weather has brought forth an army of creepy-crawlies and squadrons of nasty flying things.

They have, of course, invented repellants for pests like that, but, alas, it’s illegal to spray the stuff on Morons and Jehovah’s Witlesses, who have proved an even greater nuisance these last few days.

Which explains today’s post. Enjoy!

Posted by Barry Duke @ 9:31 am

Religion? It’s all crap suggested Einstein

A LETTER written by Einstein the year before his death says that God is the product of human weakness and that the Bible is “pretty childish”.

The letter, which being auctioned in London this week, adds more fuel to the debate about the Nobel prize-winning physicist’s religious views. It is expected to fetch around £6,000

Einstein, who became a US citizen in 1940, helped unravel the mysteries of the universe with his theory of relativity, expressed complex and arguably contradictory views on faith, perceiving a universe suffused with spirituality while rejecting organised religion.

According to KansasCity.com, the letter, written to philosopher Eric Gutkind in January 1954 — Einstein died in April 1955 at Princeton, N J – suggests his views on religion did not mellow with age.

In it, Einstein said:

The word God is for me nothing more than the expression and product of human weaknesses, the Bible a collection of honorable but still primitive legends which are nevertheless pretty childish.

He added:

For me the Jewish religion like all other religions is an incarnation of the most childish superstitions.

Addressing the idea that the Jews are God’s chosen people, Einstein wrote:

The Jewish people to whom I gladly belong and with whose mentality I have a deep affinity have no different quality for me than all other people.

John Brooke, emeritus professor of science and religion at Oxford University, said the letter lends weight to the notion that “Einstein was not a conventional theist” — although he was not an atheist, either.

He is rather quirky about religion.

Einstein famously said:

Science without religion is lame, religion without science is blind.

But he also said:

I do not believe in the God of theology who rewards good and punishes evil. My God created laws that take care of that. His universe is not ruled by wishful thinking, but by immutable laws.

UPDATE: (May 15) The letter has been sold for a staggering £170,000 to a private collector.

Posted by Barry Duke @ 9:38 am

Catholics disowns bishop who condemned sexual abuse in the Church

THERE was bound to be trouble when retired Sydney bishop Geoffrey Robinson published Confronting Power and Sex in the Catholic Church last August, because it told the Catholic Church things they just did not want to know.

So instead of dealing with the issues he raised in his book, it decided instead to disown him.

According to Catholic News, the Bishop believes that compulsory celibacy for priests and religious has contributed to sexual abuse, and must at least be on the table for discussion.

He says:

Some may speak all they wish of the benefits of celibacy for the church, but others will not stop asking, ‘How many abused children is celibacy worth’?

He believes that celibacy could contribute to unhealthy psychology, unhealthy ideas, and an unhealthy environment.

Within the Catholic Church, there is a constant insistence that on all important matters Catholics must look to the Pope for guidance and direction.

Those older values have for a thousand years included secrecy, the covering over of problems and the protection of the good name of the Church.

According to Worldwide Religious News, Australian bishops this week released a public statement suggesting that Bishop Robinson — as a bishop, a man chosen by the Pope to guard the teaching of Catholics — was wrong about the authority of Christ and the authority of the church to “teach the truth”.

The statement was the first official response to Bishop Robinson’s controversial book in which he said the church needed to reverse 2000 years of teaching on sex and power as part of radical reforms from the Pope down.

Bishop Robinson was a longtime member and chair of the Church’s professional standards committee, established by the Australian bishops to deal with the increasing wave of complaints of sexual abuse. He resigned two years ago, disillusioned by the Church’s handling of sexual abuse complaints.

Bishop Robinson, 71, who was abused as a child, headed the Australian church’s efforts to tackle clerical sexual abuse for a decade, until he retired in 2004 because he was so disillusioned.

The statement by 38 bishops commends Bishop Robinson’s contribution to the life of the church, his “years of effort to bring help and healing to those who have suffered sexual abuse”, and his work in establishing church protocols.

But, after correspondence and conversation with Bishop Robinson, “it is clear that doctrinal difficulties remain. Central to these is a questioning of the authority of the Catholic Church to teach the truth definitively”, the statement says.

Posted by Barry Duke @ 8:54 am

Oh Crap! Canadian Muslims kick off over another cartoon

NOVA Scotian Cheryfa MacAulay Jamal is a 44-year-old convert to the Religion of Perpetual Outrage.

And she is outraged over the fact that her husband Qayyum Abdul Jamal was arrested in 2006 in an anti-terrorism raid.

Now the Muslima in her one-woman tent says she “wants millions” in compensation from the federal government for the suffering her family allegedly went through as a result of her husband’s arrest.

This demand prompted Nova Scotia’s leading newspaper, the Chronicle Herald to run a cartoon depicting a woman in a burqua holding a sign that reads:

I want millions … I can put it towards my husband’s next training camp.

Dan Leger, the Herald’s director of news content, said the cartoon did not take aim at all Muslims.

The whole purpose of that cartoon was to comment on the outrageous demands of this individual for compensation long before any hearing into her case had ever been held.

Our cartoonist MacKinnon depicted her exactly the way she looks and used her own words, and that’s the genius of cartooning that you’re able to do that.

Now the The Chronicle Herald is being hauled before the province’s human rights commission for an alleged “hate crime”. More than that, the paper has been contacted by the police, too.

In his excellent blog, Ezra Levant, reveals that the complainant here “is not Mrs. Jamal, the money-grubbing wife of the accused terrorist. It’s Sheikh Ziaullah Khan, of Halifax’s Centre for Islamic Development”.

Levant also reveals that, when attractive Canadian teenager Aqsa Parvez was killed last year by her father for, amongst other sins, not wearing a hijab, Khan, in a YouTube video, did not focus his fury on Parvez’s father, but on the “hatemongers” in the media for covering the horrible story. Says Levant:

I’m surprised he didn’t file a human rights commission complaint back then.

He adds:

Why is it that Khan, whose job description is the promotion of Islam in Halifax, has allied himself with the Jamals? It’s because, regrettably, too many imams in too many mosques in North America are radical themselves, and even if they don’t preach terrorism, they excuse it, or in this case, sympathize with the accused terrorist. If only the Khan’s of this world were as eager and angry to speak out against Muslim terrorism, instead of media coverage, or Canadian counter-terrorism efforts.

Here is the bearded weirdie Khan in full-fat rant mode

Posted by Barry Duke @ 10:52 pm

Iraqi father claims God is ‘blessing him’ for killing his daughter

AN Iraqi father, who was “congratulated by police” in Basra after he beat his 17-year-old daughter to death because she had become infatuated with a British soldier, said in an interview in today’s Observer that:

Death was the least she deserved. I don’t regret it. I had the support of all my friends who are fathers, like me, and know what she did was unacceptable to any Muslim that honours his religion.

Abdel-Qader Ali, who along with his two sons killed student Rand, said he was unrepentant about her death. His only regret is that he did not kill his daughter at birth.

If I had realised then what she would become, I would have killed her the instant her mother delivered her.

Abdel-Qader Ali was arrested after the killing, but released after just two hours in detention because this was an honour killing. Sgt Ali Jabbar of Basra police said:

Not much can be done when we have an ‘honour killing’. You are in a Muslim society and women should live under religious laws.

Abdel-Qader, 46, a government employee, astonishingly said that the police actually congratulated him on what he had done.

They are men and know what honour is.

Rand, who was studying English at Basra University, was deemed to have brought shame on her family after becoming infatuated with a British soldier, 22, known only as Paul.

According to the Observer:

It was her first youthful infatuation and it would be her last. She died on 16 March after her father discovered she had been seen in public talking to Paul, considered to be the enemy, the invader and a Christian. Though her horrified mother, Leila Hussein, called Rand’s two brothers, Hassan, 23, and Haydar, 21, to restrain Abdel-Qader as he choked her with his foot on her throat, they joined in. Her shrouded corpse was then tossed into a makeshift grave without ceremony as her uncles spat on it in disgust.

Said Abdel-Qader Ali:

I don’t have a daughter now, and I prefer to say that I never had one. That girl humiliated me in front of my family and friends. Speaking with a foreign soldier, she lost what is the most precious thing for any woman. People from western countries might be shocked, but our girls are not like their daughters that can sleep with any man they want and sometimes even get pregnant without marrying. Our girls should respect their religion, their family and their bodies.

I have only two boys from now on. That girl was a mistake in my life. I know God is blessing me for what I did. My sons are by my side, and they were men enough to help me finish the life of someone who just brought shame to ours.

This sort of murder is not a rare phenomenon in Iraq. Forty seven women in Basra fell victim to “honour killings” in Basra last year. This is proof – if proof were needed – that Islam is a vile, primitive religion that makes monsters of its adherents, and idiots of its apologists.

Posted by Barry Duke @ 9:07 pm

Cardinal spouts nonsense on Radio 4’s Today programme

REASON alone is “dangerous” to society; it has to be tempered with faith if we are to avoid repeating horrors committed by the likes of Hitler and Stalin.

So said Cardinal Cormac Murphy-O’Connor, leader of Roman Catholics in England and Wales, when interviewed this morning on BBC Radio 4’s Today programme, following a lecture he gave yesterday.

He lamented the fact that “the Christian voice” was increasingly being stifled in the UK, and made the astonishing claim that people in Britain want Church leaders to speak out on key policy issues.

The Cardinal sounded less than pleased when interviewer John Humphrys put it to him that that religious leaders, in the view of people like Professor Richard Dawkins – interviewed earlier on the programme – “talk rubbish”, and should, therefore, not be permitted to interfere in government matters.

The Cardinal’s then went on dish out some garbage about atheists “constructing God” simply in order to knock him down, and to repeat the claim that Britain was a “Christian country, with 70 percent of the population professing a belief in the Christian faith”.

He added:

Britain should not be allowed to become a God-free zone.

In his lecture, the Cardinal said:

There are social currents today that want to isolate religion from other forms of knowledge and experience in order to marginalise it.

One of the things which I challenge is the desire to separate Christianity from rational inquiry. Many of our ‘new atheists’ seem unable to cope with the notion of an intelligent, reflective Christian faith. But the Catholic Christian tradition is characterised by a close relationship between reasoned understanding and religious faith. Faith for us is the flowering of reason, not its betrayal.

Terry Sanderson, President of the National Secular Society, lost no time in launching an excoriating attack on Cormac-O’Connor in this morning’s Guardian.

Murphy-O’Connor … speaks with forked tongue when he tries to portray the Catholic Church as some persecuted institution that means harm to no one. He says the Catholic Church is caricatured as ‘some heartless, insular institution that wants to deny people their freedom’.

Cardinal - this is not a caricature. It is the truth. Your own actions and pronouncements confirm it. You have tried to deny human rights to homosexuals, you have tried to rob women of the right to choose contraception and abortion and thereby take control of their lives, you have tried (and continue to try) to interfere with scientific research that may lead to the alleviation of enormous suffering.

You have attempted to manipulate the political process by pressurising Catholic MPs. On a personal level you - and your Church - try to control every aspect of your followers’ lives, from telling them what to think, what to eat and when to eat it, to telling them who they can sleep with and even what they can and cannot do when they get between the sheets …

Posted by Barry Duke @ 9:00 pm

Christian Voice targets Andrew Lloyd-Webber over an imaginary reality show

WITH no prospect now of ever bringing a blasphemy prosecution against anyone now that this vile “crime” has been abolished in the UK, the Clown Prince of British evangelism, Stephen (Stay a Virgin, Marry a Virgin) Green, has desperately been trying to find an excuse to bring his pathetic troupe of losers back onto the streets.

Alas, the best Green could come up this month was a whisper that the BBC was planning a reality show in which pop hopefuls would audition for Lord Andrew Lloyd-Webber to play the Messiah in a revival of Jesus Christ Superstar.

On hearing the rumour, an excited Green, who thinks he may have spotted a “witnessing opportunity” (code for making a horse’s arse of himself) rushed out another of his many vacuous press releases – this time promising a “Jerry Springer-type protest” if the BBC dared to go ahead with the project.

Bleated the attention-seeking Green:

Christian Voice might even try to get young Christians into the audition room itself to share the Gospel of the real Jesus Christ with Lord Lloyd-Webber himself.

Ooooh, we bet that’ll leave his Lordship trembling.

Green, who heads Christian Voice, which appears to be more a cry for help than a legitimate organisation, added:

If it were to go ahead, the show would then become for Christian Voice very much a Jerry Springer, the Opera operation, with witness and evangelism at every venue. There are still plenty of veterans of the early protests over Jesus Christ Superstar around who would love to share the Gospel with the queuing (sic) wanabees.

It might even be that we could encourage Christian singers to enrol in order to tell Andrew Lloyd-Webber just what they think of his project in the audition room itself.

But the show just ain’t gonna happen, according to Unreality TV:

We told you a few weeks ago that Sir Andrew and the beeb were considering using Jesus Christ Superstar for next year’s big reality TV event. However the BBC are said to be worried that they will face the same sort of complaints from Christian groups that they faced over the Jerry Springer Opera a few years ago.

Unreality TV said that an insider had revealed to The Sun:

Some Christian groups are bound to have a problem with Andrew telling people, ‘You could be Jesus’.

Someone should now start a rumour that Lloyd-Webber is contemplating a new musical called How Do You Solve a Problem Like the Messiah? That would sure get Green in a lather!

Posted by Barry Duke @ 9:15 am

Cardinal’s niece bares her breasts to expose his ‘hypocrisy’

THE right-wing head of Spain’s Catholic church, Cardinal Antonio María Rouco Varela, has expressed outrage over just about every reform introduced by the country’s socialist government – but nothing could have shocked this posturing old ninny more than seeing a picture of his niece on the cover of a best-selling soft porn magazine, Interviú.

Topless and dressed in suspenders, Magdalena Rouco Hernández stripped off to embarrass her uncle, who is head of the Spanish Episcopal Conference and also a friend of Pope Benedict XVI.

According to the Guardian, the mother-of-two posed bared her breasts on eight pages of the magazine – a curious mix of female flesh and serious investigations.

The 27-year-old, who went to mass every day as a girl, said she chose to do the photoshoot to expose her uncle’s “hypocrisy” following her father’s death.

My uncle never tires of repeating that the family is sacred and that you have to respect it. But then he does not respect it and abandons his own. When my father died, [Rouco] did not come to the funeral, didn’t send flowers or tell my mother of his sorrow. He told us he had a meeting with Pope John Paul II, but it was not true.

Magdelena also claimed Cardinal Rouco did not call her family after her mother’s death and failed to help her when her husband lost his job.

I wanted to bare naked the hypocrisy of my uncle.

Cardinal Rouco, 72, leads a conservative wing of the Spanish church which has clashed repeatedly with the socialist government over social reforms including the legalisation of gay marriage, quick divorces, educational reforms and stem-cell research.

The Cardinal’s hypocrisy appears to go further than just family matters.

It was recently revealed that he has been investing heavily in the Pfizer pharmaceutical company Pfizer, which manufacturers both Viagra and an injectable contraceptive, Dep-Provera, used by 30 million women worldwide.

Alas, as a result of the recent crisis over sub-prime mortgages, his investments of some 80,000 Euro a year have slumped by around 20 percent.

Awww!

Posted by Barry Duke @ 9:17 am

Drag queens told to stay out of religious processions

THERE’S nothing a girl loves more than a parade – but the “girls” who dress up for religious festivals in the strongly-Catholic Philippines have outraged the Archbishop of Manila, Gaudencio Cardinal Rosales.

Why?

Because they are MEN – and by dressing up as female saints, they are “insulting the Virgin Mary”.

Grumped Rosales:

We should keep sacred what is sacred.

The Archbishop, according to Worldwide Religious News, has admonished parishes for allowing male homosexuals to play Saint Helena and other female roles traditionally given to local beauty queens.

But leaders of the gay community maintained that “Marian devotees” among them deserved a place in the Feast of the Cross processions.

Rosales added:

The procession is religious. [But] what the [parishes] do is organise a parade. That’s an insult to the Blessed Mother. Instead of pious young women, gay men are paraded, which makes [the procession] ridiculous.

Rosales said he had taken the leaders of one parish to task for having gay cross-dressers participate in these processions.

I told them that’s not right because that’s a procession. You are destroying the purity of the devotion.

Rosales stressed he was not discriminating against homosexuals but only wanted to preserve the solemnity of the processions.

Jonas Bagas, secretary-general of Lagablab (Lesbian and Gay Legislative Advocacy Network), said he doubted Rosales’ remarks would stop the participation of homosexual men who count themselves as “Marian devotees.”

Speaking for another gay advocacy group, Ang Ladlad chair Danton Remoto said:

I don’t think they intend to make a mockery of the procession but they are there because they are true devotees of the Virgin Mary.

Remoto, a professor at Ateneo de Manila University, also noted that most gay participants were low-income folk who had saved up for expensive gowns to would wear in the procession “out of the goodness and love in their hearts for the Virgin Mary.

There is really no intention to malign the Catholic Church.

Rosales also discouraged the holding of dances at town plazas to cap Marian processions and prayers.

We should not set aside the fact that our beloved Blessed Virgin Mother Mary is the centre of these activities and celebrations. We should give importance to Mary and reflect on her life. Everything we do in this time is for our devotion to her.

The Philippines has a sizeable population of “lady-boys”, and it hosts the annual the Amazing Philippines Beauties contest open exclusively to transvestites and transsexuals.

Posted by Barry Duke @ 10:34 am

Design and hosting by mckeegan's websites