<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Vatican gets its knickers in a twist over new Dan Brown movie</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.freethinker.co.uk/2008/06/16/vatican-gets-its-knickers-in-a-twist-over-new-dan-brown-movie/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.freethinker.co.uk/2008/06/16/vatican-gets-its-knickers-in-a-twist-over-new-dan-brown-movie/</link>
	<description>The voice of atheism since 1881</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 23:19:09 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: William A.</title>
		<link>http://www.freethinker.co.uk/2008/06/16/vatican-gets-its-knickers-in-a-twist-over-new-dan-brown-movie/#comment-6178</link>
		<dc:creator>William A.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 00:59:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=863#comment-6178</guid>
		<description>Weren't the Catholic Church kind of good guys in Angels and Demons?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Weren&#8217;t the Catholic Church kind of good guys in Angels and Demons?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Stuart H.</title>
		<link>http://www.freethinker.co.uk/2008/06/16/vatican-gets-its-knickers-in-a-twist-over-new-dan-brown-movie/#comment-6166</link>
		<dc:creator>Stuart H.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 13:05:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=863#comment-6166</guid>
		<description>I wish someone in Hollywood had the imagination to film R.A. Wilson &#38; Robert Shea's 'Illuminati Trilogy' instead of Dan Brown's bilge.
Far funnier on religion, conspiracy theories &#38; just about everything else. Having taken a few of the ideas up already I'm sure KLF would come out of retirement to do the sound track too.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wish someone in Hollywood had the imagination to film R.A. Wilson &amp; Robert Shea&#8217;s &#8216;Illuminati Trilogy&#8217; instead of Dan Brown&#8217;s bilge.<br />
Far funnier on religion, conspiracy theories &amp; just about everything else. Having taken a few of the ideas up already I&#8217;m sure KLF would come out of retirement to do the sound track too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David Forcey</title>
		<link>http://www.freethinker.co.uk/2008/06/16/vatican-gets-its-knickers-in-a-twist-over-new-dan-brown-movie/#comment-6156</link>
		<dc:creator>David Forcey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 06:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=863#comment-6156</guid>
		<description>That's all well and good for them to not like the movie or the book as everybody is entitled to their own opinions, but the fact still remains that both Angles &#38; Demons and The DaVinci Code are fictional books.  As in, NOT FACT.

I fail to see why it's SUCH a big deal... If people are dumb enough to believe EVERYTHING they read in a book, just because it uses factual people/places/things/etc then, in my opinion at least, they deserve to be lumped into the same group of idiots that all 'true Christians' are in.

Also, minor point of contention: The Illuminati are not trying to fix the papacy. They are trying to completely destroy the Catholic church by blowing up Saint Peter's Basilica.  Just FYI.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s all well and good for them to not like the movie or the book as everybody is entitled to their own opinions, but the fact still remains that both Angles &amp; Demons and The DaVinci Code are fictional books.  As in, NOT FACT.</p>
<p>I fail to see why it&#8217;s SUCH a big deal&#8230; If people are dumb enough to believe EVERYTHING they read in a book, just because it uses factual people/places/things/etc then, in my opinion at least, they deserve to be lumped into the same group of idiots that all &#8216;true Christians&#8217; are in.</p>
<p>Also, minor point of contention: The Illuminati are not trying to fix the papacy. They are trying to completely destroy the Catholic church by blowing up Saint Peter&#8217;s Basilica.  Just FYI.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tim Danaher</title>
		<link>http://www.freethinker.co.uk/2008/06/16/vatican-gets-its-knickers-in-a-twist-over-new-dan-brown-movie/#comment-6108</link>
		<dc:creator>Tim Danaher</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Jun 2008 17:48:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=863#comment-6108</guid>
		<description>I loved the way the catholic church were banging on about "A book full of lies and fairy tales" (or some such). 

So that'll be the bible, then?

But Angels &#38; Demons is absolutely the worst book I've ever read... CERN even has a web-page devoted to debunking some of the stuff in there..."No, CERN doesn't have a space plane..."</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I loved the way the catholic church were banging on about &#8220;A book full of lies and fairy tales&#8221; (or some such). </p>
<p>So that&#8217;ll be the bible, then?</p>
<p>But Angels &amp; Demons is absolutely the worst book I&#8217;ve ever read&#8230; CERN even has a web-page devoted to debunking some of the stuff in there&#8230;&#8221;No, CERN doesn&#8217;t have a space plane&#8230;&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JesúsTC</title>
		<link>http://www.freethinker.co.uk/2008/06/16/vatican-gets-its-knickers-in-a-twist-over-new-dan-brown-movie/#comment-6088</link>
		<dc:creator>JesúsTC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 16 Jun 2008 22:32:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=863#comment-6088</guid>
		<description>Well, I cannot see anything wrong in the ban: they have the right to allow or not filming inside their churches.

In addition, Dan Brown opus is indeed a pot-pourri of esoteric and religious lies. Does anyone think the opposite?

I am an atheist, but I have to defend whoever I think is right, sorry.

¡Peace!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, I cannot see anything wrong in the ban: they have the right to allow or not filming inside their churches.</p>
<p>In addition, Dan Brown opus is indeed a pot-pourri of esoteric and religious lies. Does anyone think the opposite?</p>
<p>I am an atheist, but I have to defend whoever I think is right, sorry.</p>
<p>¡Peace!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
