<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Censorship net closes in</title>
	<atom:link href="http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/08/07/censorship-net-closes-in/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/08/07/censorship-net-closes-in/</link>
	<description>The voice of atheism since 1881</description>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 22:38:22 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.7</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Tom Rees</title>
		<link>http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/08/07/censorship-net-closes-in/comment-page-1/#comment-7368</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom Rees</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 11 Aug 2008 13:23:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=1371#comment-7368</guid>
		<description>When people argue for limits on free speech, it's usually to prevent incitement. But what's happening here is the opposite. The religious extremists will use the books to incite violence... and for that reason we should ban the books! That really is intolerable.

With that caveat, I can sympathise with Random House. At least they condemn the religious psychos, whilst admitting that it's not an issue they're willing to die for (and who can blame them). Amazon, on the other hand, appears to be on the side of the fruitcakes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When people argue for limits on free speech, it&#8217;s usually to prevent incitement. But what&#8217;s happening here is the opposite. The religious extremists will use the books to incite violence&#8230; and for that reason we should ban the books! That really is intolerable.</p>
<p>With that caveat, I can sympathise with Random House. At least they condemn the religious psychos, whilst admitting that it&#8217;s not an issue they&#8217;re willing to die for (and who can blame them). Amazon, on the other hand, appears to be on the side of the fruitcakes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: tony ewing</title>
		<link>http://freethinker.co.uk/2008/08/07/censorship-net-closes-in/comment-page-1/#comment-7308</link>
		<dc:creator>tony ewing</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Aug 2008 09:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.freethinker.co.uk/?p=1371#comment-7308</guid>
		<description>I hate to say this but in order to have the freedom that allows 'The Jewel of Medina' to be published, it also must allow Hoffman’s 'Judaism Discovered' to be published, no matter how repugnant that may be. Otherwise we are no better that the religious twats that would silence us all.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate to say this but in order to have the freedom that allows &#8216;The Jewel of Medina&#8217; to be published, it also must allow Hoffman’s &#8216;Judaism Discovered&#8217; to be published, no matter how repugnant that may be. Otherwise we are no better that the religious twats that would silence us all.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
